On 04.06.20 20:52, Jeongtae Park wrote: > There is a typo in comment, fix it. > "nother" -> "another" > > Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.p...@samsung.com> > Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 1e94497b7388..3091c2ca60df 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr) > * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible > * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add() > * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to > - * nother cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too. > + * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too. > */ > struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred); > >
fwiw Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
