On 6/5/20 5:43 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >> Can you include the patch as well? > > This one is outside arch/sh and I'm not sure it's permissible to go up > through my tree. I was also under the impression that only part 1 was > needed to fix the immediate problem on sh and tha part 2 was for > completeness and to make sure the same doesn't happen on other archs > in the future, but maybe my understanding here is incorrect.
Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through someone else's tree then. >> And would it be okay to send a PR to Linus >> after that? > > Sure, will do right away once we resolve what to do with the above, > and provided you don't have anything else you want me to evaluate for > inclusion. Since we haven't agreed on the __get_user_64() patch yet, I would be in favor of getting the changes pulled in that have already been reviewed and acknowledged. I rather don't want the other contributors to wait any longer. Arnd in particular has done a tremendous job to untangle all the SH-5 code and I think we should finally get this in :). Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
