> … The patch fixes this issue by
> calling rvt_free_rq().

I suggest to choose another imperative wording for your change description.
Will the tag “Fixes” become helpful for the commit message?

…
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/qp.c
> @@ -1203,6 +1203,7 @@  struct ib_qp *rvt_create_qp(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
>                       qp->s_flags = RVT_S_SIGNAL_REQ_WR;
>               err = alloc_ud_wq_attr(qp, rdi->dparms.node);
>               if (err) {
> +                     rvt_free_rq(&qp->r_rq);
>                       ret = (ERR_PTR(err));
>                       goto bail_driver_priv;
>               }

How do you think about the following code variant with the addition
of a jump target?

                err = alloc_ud_wq_attr(qp, rdi->dparms.node);
                if (err) {
                        ret = (ERR_PTR(err));
-                       goto bail_driver_priv;
+                       goto bail_free_rq;
                }

…

 bail_rq_wq:
-       rvt_free_rq(&qp->r_rq);
        free_ud_wq_attr(qp);
+
+bail_free_rq:
+       rvt_free_rq(&qp->r_rq);

 bail_driver_priv:


Regards,
Markus

Reply via email to