On Thu, Oct 18 2007, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Of course, this doesn't explain why ata_sg_is_last() was broken, but > > > > since it's working _and_ slightly more efficient, I don't really > > > > care :) > > > > > > Tomo and I agreed to kill sg_last() a few days ago anyways, so this is > > > perfectly fine with me. > > > > it would still be nice to figure out exactly why it was broken. > > It would always be nice. For this case I don't think it's very > interesting, if we pursue the improved sg iteration setup.
BTW, I think it's pretty clear that ata_sg_is_last() is broken. It's likely a one-off in the n_iter test. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
