> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:10:08AM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: > > On 2020/6/13 2:34, Kees Cook wrote: > > > This series was never applied[1], and was recently pointed out as > > > missing[2]. If someone has a tree for this, please take it. Otherwise, > > > please Ack and I'll send it to Linus. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -Kees > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190306110549.7628-1- > [email protected]/ > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1591957695-118312-1-git-send-email- > [email protected]/ > > > > > > Elena Reshetova (3): > > > nsproxy: convert nsproxy.count to refcount_t > > > groups: convert group_info.usage to refcount_t > > > creds: convert cred.usage to refcount_t > > > > > > include/linux/cred.h | 15 +++++++------- > > > include/linux/nsproxy.h | 7 +++---- > > > kernel/cred.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > > kernel/groups.c | 2 +- > > > kernel/nsproxy.c | 6 +++--- > > > net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +- > > > 6 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Should mm->mm_users also be replaced by refcount_t? > > I'll say "yes". :) > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1487671124-11188-1-git-send-email- > [email protected]/ > > > In addition, is it better to change all variables that use > > atomic_dec_and_test to control the release process to refconut_t? > > For the most part, yes. The following may find a lot of them: > scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci > > If you can go through that and double check for prior series from Elena, > we can get through all the rest of them.
I have these ones also here in case anyone is interested: https://github.com/ereshetova/linux-stable/commits/refcount_t_fs https://github.com/ereshetova/linux-stable/commits/refcount_t_block They haven't been rebased for a while, but if there is an interest, I can certainly do it. Best Regards, Elena.
