stable team,
please consider 

commit 49f2d2419d60a103752e5fbaf158cf8d07c0d884
    usercopy: mark dma-kmalloc caches as usercopy caches
for stable.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [merged] usercopy-mark-dma-kmalloc-caches-as-usercopy-caches.patch 
removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 14:37:44 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]


The patch titled
     Subject: usercopy: mark dma-kmalloc caches as usercopy caches
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     usercopy-mark-dma-kmalloc-caches-as-usercopy-caches.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Subject: usercopy: mark dma-kmalloc caches as usercopy caches

We have seen a "usercopy: Kernel memory overwrite attempt detected to SLUB
object 'dma-kmalloc-1 k' (offset 0, size 11)!" error on s390x, as IUCV
uses kmalloc() with __GFP_DMA because of memory address restrictions.  The
issue has been discussed [2] and it has been noted that if all the kmalloc
caches are marked as usercopy, there's little reason not to mark
dma-kmalloc caches too.  The 'dma' part merely means that __GFP_DMA is
used to restrict memory address range.

As Jann Horn put it [3]:

"I think dma-kmalloc slabs should be handled the same way as normal
kmalloc slabs.  When a dma-kmalloc allocation is freshly created, it is
just normal kernel memory - even if it might later be used for DMA -, and
it should be perfectly fine to copy_from_user() into such allocations at
that point, and to copy_to_user() out of them at the end.  If you look at
the places where such allocations are created, you can see things like
kmemdup(), memcpy() and so on - all normal operations that shouldn't
conceptually be different from usercopy in any relevant way."

Thus this patch marks the dma-kmalloc-* caches as usercopy.

[1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156053
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/[email protected]/
[3] 
https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/CAG48ez1a4waGk9kB0WLaSbs4muSoK0AYAVk8=xyakj4_+6e...@mail.gmail.com/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Julian Wiedmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Ursula Braun <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: David Windsor <[email protected]>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <[email protected]>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: Luis de Bethencourt <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Kubecek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---

 mm/slab_common.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/mm/slab_common.c~usercopy-mark-dma-kmalloc-caches-as-usercopy-caches
+++ a/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1303,7 +1303,8 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(slab_f
                        kmalloc_caches[KMALLOC_DMA][i] = create_kmalloc_cache(
                                kmalloc_info[i].name[KMALLOC_DMA],
                                kmalloc_info[i].size,
-                               SLAB_CACHE_DMA | flags, 0, 0);
+                               SLAB_CACHE_DMA | flags, 0,
+                               kmalloc_info[i].size);
                }
        }
 #endif
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are

kernel-sysctl-support-setting-sysctl-parameters-from-kernel-command-line.patch
kernel-sysctl-support-handling-command-line-aliases.patch
kernel-hung_task-convert-hung_task_panic-boot-parameter-to-sysctl.patch
tools-testing-selftests-sysctl-sysctlsh-support-config_test_sysctl=y.patch
lib-test_sysctl-support-testing-of-sysctl-boot-parameter.patch
lib-test_sysctl-support-testing-of-sysctl-boot-parameter-fix.patch

Reply via email to