Hi, On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:44 AM Srinivas Kandagatla <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> +properties: > >> + compatible: > >> + enum: > >> + - qcom,qfprom > > > > As per discussion in patch #1, I believe SoC compatible should be here > > too in case it is ever needed. This is standard practice for dts > > files for IP blocks embedded in an SoC. AKA, this should be: > > > > items: > > - enum: > > - qcom,apq8064-qfprom > > - qcom,apq8084-qfprom > > - qcom,msm8974-qfprom > > - qcom,msm8916-qfprom > > - qcom,msm8996-qfprom > > - qcom,msm8998-qfprom > > - qcom,qcs404-qfprom > > - qcom,sc7180-qfprom > > - qcom,sdm845-qfprom > > > Above is not required for now in this patchset, as we can attach data at > runtime specific to version of the qfprom. > > This can be added when required!
I'm OK with leaving off for this patchset. After we get everything landed for blowing fuses then I can send out a separate patch where we can debate the merits of adding the SoC-specific compatible strings. :-) Sound good? -Doug
