> On Jun 22, 2020, at 1:37 AM, syzbot
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at mm/slab.h:232 kmem_cache_free+0x0/0x200
> mm/slab.c:2262
Is there any particular reason to use CONFIG_SLAB rather than CONFIG_SLUB?
You are really asking for trouble to test something that almost nobody is
exercising that code path very well nowadays.
Anyway, there is a patchset in -mm that might well introduce this regression
that we could go to confirm it, but I kind of don’t want to spend too much time
on SLAB that suppose to be obsolete eventually.
