From: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]> The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below. Fix the name of litmus test.
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <[email protected]> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> --- tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt index 7fe8d7a..63c4adf 100644 --- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt +++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock. Consider this example: - /* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */ + /* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */ void CPU0(void) { spin_lock(&mylock); -- 2.9.5
