In v9fs_vfs_rename function labels don't match the fids that are clunked.
The correct clunk order is clunking newdirfid first and then olddirfid next.

Signed-off-by: Latchesar Ionkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
commit 0c9269a1384273b7a409a2163fdf91cd39092889
tree 8a4984196ccb7ed027c086a53866e5582835e61f
parent 55b70a0300b873c0ec7ea6e33752af56f41250ce
author Latchesar Ionkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:11:19 -0600
committer Latchesar Ionkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:11:19 -0600

 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
index 175b4d9..23581bc 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -687,10 +687,10 @@ v9fs_vfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry 
*old_dentry,
        retval = p9_client_wstat(oldfid, &wstat);
 
 clunk_newdir:
-       p9_client_clunk(olddirfid);
+       p9_client_clunk(newdirfid);
 
 clunk_olddir:
-       p9_client_clunk(newdirfid);
+       p9_client_clunk(olddirfid);
 
 done:
        return retval;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to