On 6/25/20 1:03 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
Match the naming with other nested svm functions.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 6 +++---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index e0b0321d95d4..b0d551bcf2a0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -3040,7 +3040,7 @@ static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int tpr, int irr)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
- if (svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
+ if (nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
return;
clr_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE);
@@ -3234,7 +3234,7 @@ static inline void sync_cr8_to_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
- if (svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
+ if (nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(vcpu))
return;
if (!is_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE)) {
@@ -3248,7 +3248,7 @@ static inline void sync_lapic_to_cr8(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu)
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
u64 cr8;
- if (svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(vcpu) ||
+ if (nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(vcpu) ||
kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
return;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 003e89008331..8907efda0b0a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ void svm_set_gif(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool value);
#define NESTED_EXIT_DONE 1 /* Exit caused nested vmexit */
#define NESTED_EXIT_CONTINUE 2 /* Further checks needed */
-static inline bool svm_nested_virtualize_tpr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline bool nested_svm_virtualize_tpr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
Should the name be changed to svm_nested_virtualized_tpr ? Because
svm_nested_virtualize_tpr implies that the action of the function is to
virtualize the TPR.
