From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:14:01 +0200
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:34:43PM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: >> From: Alex Belits <[email protected]> >> >> With the existing implementation of store_rps_map(), packets are queued >> in the receive path on the backlog queues of other CPUs irrespective of >> whether they are isolated or not. This could add a latency overhead to >> any RT workload that is running on the same CPU. >> >> Ensure that store_rps_map() only uses available housekeeping CPUs for >> storing the rps_map. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Belits <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <[email protected]> > > Dave, ACK if I route this? No problem: Acked-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
