On 26-06-20, 21:13, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> +static int tegra194_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data;
> + struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp;
> + int err, i;
> +
> + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + data->num_clusters = MAX_CLUSTERS;
> + data->tables = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, data->num_clusters,
> + sizeof(*data->tables), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!data->tables)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> +
> + bpmp = tegra_bpmp_get(&pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(bpmp))
> + return PTR_ERR(bpmp);
> +
> + read_counters_wq = alloc_workqueue("read_counters_wq", __WQ_LEGACY, 1);
> + if (!read_counters_wq) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to create_workqueue\n");
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto put_bpmp;
This will call destroy_workqueue() eventually and it will crash your
kernel.
Apart from this, this stuff looks okay. Don't resend the patch just
yet (and if required, send only this patch using --in-reply-to flag
for git send email). Lets wait for an Ack from Rob for the first two
patches.
> + }
> +
--
viresh
