On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 06:11:52PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: SNIP
> >> > >> I'm confused, are you talking about file descriptors limit now? > >> this wont be affected by epoll change.. what do I miss? > > > > Currently there is already uname -n limit on the amount of open file > > descriptors > > and Perf tool process is affected by that limit. > > > > Moving to epoll() will impose one more max_user_watches limit and that can > > additionally > > confine Perf applicability even though default value on some machines > > currently > > is high enough. > > Prior making v9 I would prefer to agree on some design to be implemented in > order to > avoid guessing and redundant reiterating. > > Options that I see as good balanced ones are 1) or 5), + non screwing of fds > to fix > staleness of pos(=fdarray__add()). > > Are there any thoughts so far? let's try it and discuss over the code jirka
