On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Dave Hansen wrote:

> 
> From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> 
> I went to go add a new RECLAIM_* mode for the zone_reclaim_mode
> sysctl.  Like a good kernel developer, I also went to go update the
> documentation.  I noticed that the bits in the documentation didn't
> match the bits in the #defines.
> 
> The VM never explicitly checks the RECLAIM_ZONE bit.  The bit is,
> however implicitly checked when checking 'node_reclaim_mode==0'.
> The RECLAIM_ZONE #define was removed in a cleanup.  That, by itself
> is fine.
> 
> But, when the bit was removed (bit 0) the _other_ bit locations also
> got changed.  That's not OK because the bit values are documented to
> mean one specific thing and users surely rely on them meaning that one
> thing and not changing from kernel to kernel.  The end result is that
> if someone had a script that did:
> 
>       sysctl vm.zone_reclaim_mode=1
> 
> That script went from doing nothing to writing out pages during
> node reclaim after the commit in question.  That's not great.
> 
> Put the bits back the way they were and add a comment so something
> like this is a bit harder to do again.  Update the documentation to
> make it clear that the first bit is ignored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 648b5cf368e0 ("mm/vmscan: remove unused RECLAIM_OFF/RECLAIM_ZONE")
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
> Cc: Alex Shi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: Huang Ying <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Cc: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Wagner <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]

Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

Reply via email to