* Casey Schaufler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > And don't give me the old "LKML is a tough crowd" feldercarb. > Security modules have been much worse. Innovation, even in > security, is a good thing and treating people harshly, even > "for their own good", is an impediment to innovation.
I agree that innovation is critical to the success of Linux, and security is not immune to that. The trouble is that most of the security modules that have come forward have had some real serious shortcomings. I do believe it is prudent to keep in-tree security sensitive code under high scrutiny because we do not want to create security holes by adding problematic security code. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
