On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:55:57PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
[...]
> > > Another way of fixing it is just dropping the lock letting the page
> > > allocator to do an allocation without our "upper/local" lock. I did a
> > > proposal like that once upon a time, so maybe it is a time to highlight
> > > it again:
> > > <snip>
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > index 21c2fa5bd8c3..249f10a89bb9 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > @@ -3278,9 +3278,11 @@ static void kfree_rcu_monitor(struct work_struct
> > > *work)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static inline bool
> > > -kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, void *ptr)
> > > +kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
> > > + void *ptr, unsigned long *flags)
> > > {
> > > struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *bnode;
> > > + struct kfree_rcu_cpu *tmp;
> > > int idx;
> > >
> > > if (unlikely(!krcp->initialized))
> > > @@ -3306,6 +3308,9 @@ kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct
> > > kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, void *ptr)
> > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> > > return false;
> > >
> > > + migrate_disable();
> > > + krc_this_cpu_unlock(krcp, *flags);
> >
> > If I remember, the issue here is that migrate_disable is not implemented on
> > a
> > non-RT kernel due to issues with starvation.
> >
> It is implemented. Please have a look linux/preempt.h for regular kernel.
Yeah sorry, I meant it is not implemented in the right way in the sense - it
disables migration with the preempt-disable hammer.
Anyway, I think as we discussed on IRC, your proposal will work for both
kernels while allowing us to keep the internal lock as raw.
thanks,
- Joel
