On 06/07/20 22:55, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/24/20 12:21 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 23/06/20 22:44, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>>> ret = sys_pidfd_send_signal(pidfd, 0, NULL, 0);
>>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>>> - if (errno == ENOSYS)
>>>> - ksft_exit_skip(
>>>> + if (errno == ENOSYS) {
>>>> + ksft_test_result_skip(
>>>> "%s test: pidfd_send_signal() syscall not
>>>> supported\n",
>>>> test_name);
>>> If pidfd_send_signal() is not supported, you're falling through and then
>>> you're reporting:
>>>
>>> ok 5 # SKIP pidfd_send_signal check for support test:
>>> pidfd_send_signal() syscall not supported
>>> ok 6 pidfd_send_signal check for support test: pidfd_send_signal()
>>> syscall is supported. Tests can be executed
>>
>> You're right, this needs a "return".
>>
>
> Hi Paulo,
>
> I am applying the rest of the patches in this series except this one.
> Please send v3 for this.
Thanks, I was actually going to send everything but you're making it
even simpler. I'll send v3 of this patch only.
Paolo
