Use the general page fault accounting by passing regs into handle_mm_fault().
It naturally solve the issue of multiple page fault accounting when page fault
retry happened.

Add the missing PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS perf events too.  Note, the other two
perf events (PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS_[MAJ|MIN]) were done in 
handle_mm_fault().

CC: James E.J. Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
CC: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>
CC: linux-par...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
---
 arch/parisc/mm/fault.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c b/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c
index e32d06928c24..4bfe2da9fbe3 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/extable.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
 
 #include <asm/traps.h>
 
@@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long code,
        acc_type = parisc_acctyp(code, regs->iir);
        if (acc_type & VM_WRITE)
                flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
+       perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);
 retry:
        mmap_read_lock(mm);
        vma = find_vma_prev(mm, address, &prev_vma);
@@ -302,7 +304,7 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long code,
         * fault.
         */
 
-       fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, NULL);
+       fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags, regs);
 
        if (fault_signal_pending(fault, regs))
                return;
@@ -323,10 +325,6 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long 
code,
                BUG();
        }
        if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY) {
-               if (fault & VM_FAULT_MAJOR)
-                       current->maj_flt++;
-               else
-                       current->min_flt++;
                if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
                        /*
                         * No need to mmap_read_unlock(mm) as we would
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to