Hi,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 1:20 AM Sibi Sankar <si...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Having a non-MSA (Modem Self-Authentication) SID bypassed breaks modem
> sandboxing i.e if a transaction were to originate from it, the hardware
> memory protections units (XPUs) would fail to flag them (any transaction
> originating from modem are historically termed as an MSA transaction).
> Drop the unused non-MSA modem SID on SC7180 SoCs and cheza so that SMMU
> continues to block them.
>
> Fixes: bec71ba243e95 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Update Q6V5 MSS node")
> Fixes: 68aee4af5f620 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-cheza: Add iommus property")
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ran...@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <si...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I'm not sure if my review is worth all that much since it's not my
area of expertise, but as far as I can tell this is good / ready to go
in. I've confirmed that a similar on my sc7180 board doesn't seem to
break anything for me so restricting things like this seems sane.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
-Doug
