On 07/07/2020 12:30, Gene Chen wrote:
From: Gene Chen <[email protected]>
Remove handle_post_irq which is used to retrigger irq.
Set irq level low trigger to keep irq always be handled.
Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
index 5dfc13e..2dd5918 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
@@ -208,24 +208,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq mt6360_irqs[] = {
REGMAP_IRQ_REG_LINE(MT6360_LDO7_PGB_EVT, 8),
};
-static int mt6360_pmu_handle_post_irq(void *irq_drv_data)
-{
- struct mt6360_data *data = irq_drv_data;
-
- return regmap_update_bits(data->regmap,
- MT6360_PMU_IRQ_SET, MT6360_IRQ_RETRIG, MT6360_IRQ_RETRIG);
-}
-
-static struct regmap_irq_chip mt6360_irq_chip = {
+static const struct regmap_irq_chip mt6360_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "mt6360_irqs",
.irqs = mt6360_irqs,
.num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(mt6360_irqs),
- .num_regs = MT6360_PMU_IRQ_REGNUM,
- .mask_base = MT6360_PMU_CHG_MASK1,
- .status_base = MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ1,
- .ack_base = MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ1,
+ .num_regs = MT6360_IRQ_REGNUM,
+ .mask_base = MT6360_REG_PMU_CHGMASK1,
+ .status_base = MT6360_REG_PMU_CHGIRQ1,
+ .ack_base = MT6360_REG_PMU_CHGIRQ1,
Non relevant patches for the commit. Please drop this.
.init_ack_masked = true,
.use_ack = true,
- .handle_post_irq = mt6360_pmu_handle_post_irq,
};
static const struct regmap_config mt6360_pmu_regmap_config = {
@@ -339,10 +331,9 @@ static int mt6360_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
return -ENODEV;
}
- mt6360_irq_chip.irq_drv_data = data;
ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(&client->dev, data->regmap, client->irq,
- IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, 0,
- &mt6360_irq_chip, &data->irq_data);
+ IRQF_ONESHOT, 0, &mt6360_irq_chip,
From what I see IRQF_ONESHOT is set implicitly in regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode.
Actually I think what you want to add is IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW.
+ &data->irq_data);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to add Regmap IRQ Chip\n");
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h
index 76077e4..9fc6718 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6360.h
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ struct mt6360_data {
#define MT6360_PMU_SPARE2 (0xA0)
#define MT6360_PMU_SPARE3 (0xB0)
#define MT6360_PMU_SPARE4 (0xC0)
-#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ1 (0xD0)
+#define MT6360_REG_PMU_CHGIRQ1 (0xD0)
#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ2 (0xD1)
#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ3 (0xD2)
#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ4 (0xD3)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct mt6360_data {
#define MT6360_PMU_BUCK2_STAT (0xED)
#define MT6360_PMU_LDO_STAT1 (0xEE)
#define MT6360_PMU_LDO_STAT2 (0xEF)
-#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_MASK1 (0xF0)
+#define MT6360_REG_PMU_CHGMASK1 (0xF0)
#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_MASK2 (0xF1)
#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_MASK3 (0xF2)
#define MT6360_PMU_CHG_MASK4 (0xF3)
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ struct mt6360_data {
#define MT6360_PMU_MAXREG (MT6360_PMU_LDO_MASK2)
/* MT6360_PMU_IRQ_SET */
-#define MT6360_PMU_IRQ_REGNUM (MT6360_PMU_LDO_IRQ2 - MT6360_PMU_CHG_IRQ1 + 1)
Not relevant for the commit. But why did you use this strange computation in the
first place?
+#define MT6360_IRQ_REGNUM 16
#define MT6360_IRQ_RETRIG BIT(2)
#define CHIP_VEN_MASK (0xF0)
