On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > EFI uses the Windows x86_64 calling convention. The lin2win may be a > > more general naming convention that can be used for some other code (the > > NDISwrapper?) in the future. Do you agree? > > I agree not at all. I do not care whether the EFI creators smoked the > Windows-crackpipe or some other hallucinogen when they decided to use > this calling convention. We definitely do not want to think about > NDISwrapper or any other Windows related hackery in the kernel.
OK, I will change the name to something like lin2efi. > I still do not understand why we need all this EFI hackery at all > aside of the possible usage for saving a crash dump on FLASH, which we > could do directly from the kernel as well. Ask every user to setup a crash dump environment is a bit difficult because some configuration like reserving memory, loading crash dump kernel must be done. But saving OOPS information in FLASH via EFI variable runtime service is quite simple, without configuration requirement. That is, there could be more bug report with OOPS information. I think this is useful. Best Regards, Huang Ying - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
