Hi Bart,

On 2020-07-14 11:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 2020-07-13 19:28, Can Guo wrote:
Dumping testbus registers needs to sleep a bit intermittently as there are too many of them. Skip them for those contexts where sleep is not allowed.

Meanwhile, if ufs_qcom_dump_dbg_regs() calls ufs_qcom_testbus_config() from ufshcd_suspend/resume and/or clk gate/ungate context, pm_runtime_get_sync()
and ufshcd_hold() will cause racing problems. Fix it by removing the
unnecessary calls of pm_runtime_get_sync() and ufshcd_hold().

Signed-off-by: Can Guo <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 17 +++++++----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 2e6ddb5..3743c17 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -1604,9 +1604,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
         */
        }
        mask <<= offset;
-
-       pm_runtime_get_sync(host->hba->dev);
-       ufshcd_hold(host->hba, false);
        ufshcd_rmwl(host->hba, TEST_BUS_SEL,
                    (u32)host->testbus.select_major << 19,
                    REG_UFS_CFG1);
@@ -1619,8 +1616,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_testbus_config(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
         * committed before returning.
         */
        mb();
-       ufshcd_release(host->hba);
-       pm_runtime_put_sync(host->hba->dev);

        return 0;
 }
@@ -1658,11 +1653,13 @@ static void ufs_qcom_dump_dbg_regs(struct ufs_hba *hba)

        /* sleep a bit intermittently as we are dumping too much data */
ufs_qcom_print_hw_debug_reg_all(hba, NULL, ufs_qcom_dump_regs_wrapper);
-       udelay(1000);
-       ufs_qcom_testbus_read(hba);
-       udelay(1000);
-       ufs_qcom_print_unipro_testbus(hba);
-       udelay(1000);
+       if (in_task()) {
+               udelay(1000);
+               ufs_qcom_testbus_read(hba);
+               udelay(1000);
+               ufs_qcom_print_unipro_testbus(hba);
+               udelay(1000);
+       }
 }

It is not clear to me how udelay() calls can help in code that takes long since these functions use busy-waiting? Should the udelay() calls perhaps
be changed into cond_resched() calls?

Thanks,

Bart.

Maybe you are right, but this is not the purpose of this change. I am just
trying to make sure this func can be invoked from any contexts without
making troubles like schedule while atomic and/or race conditions.

Thanks,

Can Guo.

Reply via email to