Please disregard this patch. I misunderstood the protocol and have found the actual problem in the hypervisor's 9P implementation. Sorry about the noise.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 1:54 PM Eric Biggers <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > > > > Fixes: 5643135a2846 ("fs/9p: This patch implements TLCREATE for 9p2000.L > > > protocol.") > > > Signed-off-by: Victor Hsieh <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > (afaiu it is normally frowned upon for developers to add this cc (I can > > understand stable@ not wanting spam discussing issues left and right > > before maintainers agreed on them!) ; I can add it to the commit itself > > if requested but they normally pick most such fixes pretty nicely for > > backport anyway; I see most 9p patches backported as long as the patch > > applies cleanly which is pretty much all the time. > > Please let me know if I understood that incorrectly) > > > > Some people assume this, but the stable maintainers themselves say that Cc'ing > [email protected] on in-development patches is fine: > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > And doing so is pretty much inevitable, since the tag gets picked up by > 'git send-email'. (Yes, there's also "[email protected]", but it's not > actually > what is documented.) > > - Eric
