Am 28.10.2007 10:25 schrieb Stefan Richter: > You two are hypothesizing.
No, we're not. We're discussing the very real issue of whether LSM should be amputated in such a way as to make life difficult for out of tree security module developers. > - We (most of us) change APIs to improve the kernel. That's good. If that was consensus then this discussion would not be necessary. What I am protesting against is attempts to change the API purposely to obstruct out-of-tree code. That is not a way to improve the kernel. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
