On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 21:35:51 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:55:07 +0200
> "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darw...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > +Read path, three categories:
> > +
> > +1. Normal Sequence readers which never block a writer but they must
> > + retry if a writer is in progress by detecting change in the sequence
> > + number. Writers do not wait for a sequence reader::
> > +
> > + do {
> > + seq = read_seqbegin(&foo_seqlock);
> > +
> > + /* ... [[read-side critical section]] ... */
> > +
> > + } while (read_seqretry(&foo_seqlock, seq));
> > +
> > +2. Locking readers which will wait if a writer or another locking reader
> > + is in progress. A locking reader in progress will also block a writer
> > + from entering its critical section. This read lock is
> > + exclusive. Unlike rwlock_t, only one locking reader can acquire it::
>
> Nit, but I would mention that this acts similar to a normal spin_lock, and
> even disables preeption (in the non-RT case).
What I learned today: Ctrl-return on claws mail sends the email :-p
I need to disable that before I send another email before I'm done with it!
I haven't finished reading the rest.
-- Steve
