On Tuesday 30 October 2007 09:17:38 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > > CC'ed John and removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) > > > From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > tsc is very good time source (when it does not have drifts, does not > > change it's frequency, i.e. when it works), so it should have its rating > > raised to a value greater than, or equal 400. > > > > Since it's being a tendency among paravirt clocksources to use values > > around 400, we should declare tsc as even better: So we use 500. > > > > This patch also touches the comments on clocksource.h, which suggests > > that 499 would be a limit on the rating values. > > > > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No. tsc is very good, it's not perfect. If a paravirt clock registers 400 it really means "pick me over the tsc". That's *why* they use > 400: it's in the documentation. Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
