On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 02:35:17PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:15:25PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > > Hello Greg, > > > > > > (Re-sending this pull request) > > > > > > This is habanalabs pull request for the merge window of kernel 5.9. It > > > contains many small improvements to common and GAUDI code. Details are in > > > the tag. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Oded > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > 7a4462a96777b64b22412f782de226c90290bf75: > > > > > > misc: rtsx: Use standard PCI definitions (2020-07-22 13:39:31 +0200) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/linux > > > tags/misc-habanalabs-next-2020-07-23 > > > > {sigh} > > > > Commit: 961a7325e670 ("habanalabs: Fix memory leak in error flow of context > > init") > > Fixes tag: Fixes: 786c94810698 ("habanalabs: Use pending cs amount > > per asic") > > Has these problem(s): > > - Subject does not match target commit subject > > Just use > > git log -1 --format='Fixes: %h ("%s")' > > > > The scripts I use to check this are here: > > > > https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_fixes.sh > > > > https://github.com/gregkh/gregkh-linux/blob/master/work/verify_signedoff.sh > > > > And note, if I ignore these errors, you will just get the same response > > from Stephen when it hits linux-next :( > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > I'm sorry for all the trouble Greg, but I wanted to ask before I send > it again, won't the fixed sha-id be wrong once you merge this pull > request to your tree ?
Nope, that's because I am using git to merge it. > Because this patch fixes a previous patch in this pull-request. > Maybe I should just squash them ? That's up to you. If it was a different author, perhaps keep them separate, it's your call. thanks, greg k-h
