Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes: > * Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes: >> > The __secure_computing() callback only exists on CONFIG_SECCOMP=y, >> >> No. There is a stub function for the SECCOMP=n case. > > Which was buggy: > > static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
Yes. I screwed that up and fixing that is the right thing to do.
