On 7/9/2020 10:57 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 09 Jul 08:50 PDT 2020, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/9/2020 8:01 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> With many Qualcomm platforms not having functional S2CR BYPASS a
>>> temporary IOMMU domain, without translation, needs to be allocated in
>>> order to allow these memory transactions.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the boot loader uses the first few context banks, so
>>> rather than overwriting a active bank the last context bank is used and
>>> streams are diverted here during initialization.
>>>
>>> This also performs the readback of SMR registers for the Qualcomm
>>> platform, to trigger the mechanism.
>>>
>>> This is based on prior work by Thierry Reding and Laurentiu Tudor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 11 +++++
>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h | 3 ++
>>> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> index 86b1917459a4..397df27c1d69 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>>> qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] = {
>>> static int qcom_smmu_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>> {
>>> unsigned int last_s2cr = ARM_SMMU_GR0_S2CR(smmu->num_mapping_groups -
>>> 1);
>>> + u32 smr;
>>> u32 reg;
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> @@ -56,6 +57,16 @@ static int qcom_smmu_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device
>>> *smmu)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> + for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
>>> + smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
>>> +
>>> + if (FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr)) {
>>> + smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
>>> + smmu->smrs[i].mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, smr);
>>> + smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> index e2d6c0aaf1ea..a7cb27c1a49e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> @@ -652,7 +652,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_context_bank(struct
>>> arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx)
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>>> - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>>> + bool boot_domain)
>>> {
>>> int irq, start, ret = 0;
>>> unsigned long ias, oas;
>>> @@ -770,6 +771,15 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct
>>> iommu_domain *domain,
>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>> goto out_unlock;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Use the last context bank for identity mappings during boot, to
>>> + * avoid overwriting in-use bank configuration while we're setting up
>>> + * the new mappings.
>>> + */
>>> + if (boot_domain)
>>> + start = smmu->num_context_banks - 1;
>>> +
>>> ret = __arm_smmu_alloc_bitmap(smmu->context_map, start,
>>> smmu->num_context_banks);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> @@ -1149,7 +1159,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain
>>> *domain, struct device *dev)
>>> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
>>> struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>>> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
>>> + bool free_identity_domain = false;
>>> + int idx;
>>> int ret;
>>> + int i;
>>>
>>> if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &arm_smmu_ops) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to SMMU, is it on the same bus?\n");
>>> @@ -1174,7 +1187,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain
>>> *domain, struct device *dev)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> /* Ensure that the domain is finalised */
>>> - ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu);
>>> + ret = arm_smmu_init_domain_context(domain, smmu, false);
>>> if (ret < 0)
>>> goto rpm_put;
>>>
>>> @@ -1190,9 +1203,34 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain
>>> *domain, struct device *dev)
>>> goto rpm_put;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* Decrement use counter for any references to the identity domain */
>>> + mutex_lock(&smmu->stream_map_mutex);
>>> + if (smmu->identity) {
>>> + struct arm_smmu_domain *identity =
>>> to_smmu_domain(smmu->identity);
>>> +
>>> + for_each_cfg_sme(cfg, fwspec, i, idx) {
>>> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "%s() %#x\n", __func__,
>>> smmu->smrs[idx].id);
>>
>> Debug leftovers?
>>
>
> Indeed.
>
>> Apart from that I plan to give this a go on some NXP chips. Will keep
>> you updated.
>>
>
> Thanks, I'm expecting that all you need is the first patch in the series
> and some impl specific cfg_probe that sets up (or read back) the
> relevant SMRs and mark them valid.
>
I finally managed to give a go to the v2 of this patchset and tested it
on a NXP LS2088A chip with the diff [1] below, so please feel free to add:
Tested-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com>
Now a question for the SMMU folks: would the approach in the diff below
be acceptable?
[1]
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
@@ -102,6 +102,32 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device
*cavium_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smm
return &cs->smmu;
}
+static int nxp_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ int i, cnt = 0;
+ u32 smr;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_mapping_groups; i++) {
+ smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
+
+ if (FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr)) {
+ smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
+ smmu->smrs[i].mask =
FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, smr);
+ smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
+
+ cnt++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ dev_notice(smmu->dev, "\tpreserved %d boot mapping%s\n", cnt,
+ cnt == 1 ? "" : "s");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct arm_smmu_impl nxp_impl = {
+ .cfg_probe = nxp_cfg_probe,
+};
#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE (1 << 1)
@@ -171,6 +197,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct
arm_smmu_device *smmu)
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access"))
smmu->impl = &calxeda_impl;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "nxp,keep-bypass-mappings"))
+ smmu->impl = &nxp_impl;
+
if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500") ||
of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500"))
return qcom_smmu_impl_init(smmu);
---
Thanks & Best Regards, Laurentiu
