On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:23:41PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:04:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 04:17:54PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote: > > > Same as v5 previously posted, but rebased onto next-20200717. > > > > > > v5: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200715004133.1430068-1-nived...@alum.mit.edu/ > > > > BTW, some bits of feedback on process: > > > > - please don't re-use version numbers, this is confusing :) > > This was a special case as there were no actual changes in this version.
It ended up missing some review tags, etc. > > - please fix whatever is happening with the "In-Reply-To:" headers, the > > threading is extremely hard to understand (each patch isn't a reply to > > the cover letter, and everything is a reply to a single earlier email) > > I think this is because I'm passing --in-reply-to to format-patch. > Seems like I should specify that in send-email instead, hopefully that > will fix the threading. Ah yes, I think would do it -- it overrides the normal threading that send-email does. Usually --in-reply-to is for a single email. Thanks for checking! -- Kees Cook