Hello Dmitry, thanks for looking into the patch. :)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:19:39PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:23:01PM +0200, Ondrej Jirman wrote: > > Make enable-gpio optional to allow using this driver with boards that > > have vibrator connected to a power supply without intermediate gpio > > based enable circuitry. > > > > Also avoid a case where neither regulator nor enable gpio is specified, > > and bail out in probe in such a case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c > > b/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c > > index f79f75595dd7..b3bb7e61ed1d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/gpio-vibra.c > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_start(struct gpio_vibrator > > *vibrator) > > struct device *pdev = vibrator->input->dev.parent; > > int err; > > > > - if (!vibrator->vcc_on) { > > + if (vibrator->vcc && !vibrator->vcc_on) { > > err = regulator_enable(vibrator->vcc); > > if (err) { > > dev_err(pdev, "failed to enable regulator: %d\n", err); > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void gpio_vibrator_stop(struct gpio_vibrator > > *vibrator) > > { > > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(vibrator->gpio, 0); > > > > - if (vibrator->vcc_on) { > > + if (vibrator->vcc && vibrator->vcc_on) { > > regulator_disable(vibrator->vcc); > > vibrator->vcc_on = false; > > } > > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device > > *pdev) > > if (!vibrator->input) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > - vibrator->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vcc"); > > + vibrator->vcc = devm_regulator_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "vcc"); > > I know it is very surprising, but regulator_get_optional does not return > NULL when regulator is not present, but rather ERR_PTR(-ENODEV). You > need to replace it with NULL in the branch below, or change conditions > to !IS_ERR(virbrator->vcc) (and still handle -ENODEV in the branch > below). Oops, I'll fix that in the next revision. regards, o. > > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->vcc); > > if (err) { > > if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) > > @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device > > *pdev) > > return err; > > } > > > > - vibrator->gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > + vibrator->gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable", > > + GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vibrator->gpio); > > if (err) { > > if (err != -EPROBE_DEFER) > > @@ -130,6 +131,11 @@ static int gpio_vibrator_probe(struct platform_device > > *pdev) > > return err; > > } > > > > + if (!vibrator->vcc && !vibrator->gpio) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Neither gpio nor regulator provided\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > INIT_WORK(&vibrator->play_work, gpio_vibrator_play_work); > > > > vibrator->input->name = "gpio-vibrator"; > > -- > > 2.27.0 > > > > Thanks. > > -- > Dmitry
