On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 15:02 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > Rename need_lockbreak to spin_needbreak, make it use spin_is_contended to > decouple it from the spinlock implementation, and make it typesafe (rwlocks > do not have any need_lockbreak sites -- why do they even get bloated up > with that break_lock then?).
IIRC Lee has a few patches floating about that do introduce lockbreak stuff for rwlocks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
