From: Wang Hai <wangha...@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 74d6a5d5662975aed7f25952f62efbb6f6dadd29 ]

p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled may be called concurrently.
In some cases, req->req_list may be deleted by both p9_read_work
and p9_fd_cancelled.

We can fix it by ignoring replies associated with a cancelled
request and ignoring cancelled request if message has been received
before lock.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612090833.36149-1-wangha...@huawei.com
Fixes: 60ff779c4abb ("9p: client: remove unused code and any reference to 
"cancelled" function")
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v3.12+
Reported-by: syzbot+77a25acfa0382e06a...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wangha...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmad...@codewreck.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 net/9p/trans_fd.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index cbd8cfafb7940..32de8afbfbf8e 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -383,6 +383,10 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
                if (m->req->status == REQ_STATUS_SENT) {
                        list_del(&m->req->req_list);
                        p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req, REQ_STATUS_RCVD);
+               } else if (m->req->status == REQ_STATUS_FLSHD) {
+                       /* Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request. 
*/
+                       p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS,
+                                "Ignore replies associated with a cancelled 
request\n");
                } else {
                        spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
                        p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR,
@@ -717,11 +721,20 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, 
struct p9_req_t *req)
 {
        p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "client %p req %p\n", client, req);
 
+       spin_lock(&client->lock);
+       /* Ignore cancelled request if message has been received
+        * before lock.
+        */
+       if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_RCVD) {
+               spin_unlock(&client->lock);
+               return 0;
+       }
+
        /* we haven't received a response for oldreq,
         * remove it from the list.
         */
-       spin_lock(&client->lock);
        list_del(&req->req_list);
+       req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
        spin_unlock(&client->lock);
 
        return 0;
-- 
2.25.1



Reply via email to