On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:38:37PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > > > While this does seem to be the right solution for the extant problem, I > > > do want to take a moment and ask if the function sections need to be > > > exposed at all? What tools use this information, and do they just want > > > to see the bounds of the code region? (i.e. the start/end of all the > > > .text* sections) Perhaps .text.* could be excluded from the sysfs > > > section list? > > > [[cc += FChE, see [0] for Evgenii's full mail ]] > > Thanks! > > > It looks like debugging tools like systemtap [1], gdb [2] and its > > add-symbol-file cmd, etc. peek at the /sys/module/<MOD>/section/ info. > > But yeah, it would be preferable if we didn't export a long sysfs > > representation if nobody actually needs it. > > Systemtap needs to know base addresses of loaded text & data sections, > in order to perform relocation of probe point PCs and context data > addresses. It uses /sys/module/...., kind of under protest, because > there seems to exist no MODULE_EXPORT'd API to get at that information > some other way.
Wouldn't /proc/kallsysms entries cover this? I must be missing something... -- Kees Cook
