Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: >On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:58 AM Miaohe Lin <linmia...@huawei.com> wrote: >> >> The npages test against MAX_SKB_FRAGS can be relaxed if we succeed to >> allocate high order pages as the note in comment said. >> > > >We do not want this change. > >This interface is used by datagram providers, we do not want to claim they can >safely use skb allocations over 64KB. > >Returning -EMSGSIZE should not depend on availability of high-order pages. > >The comment was a hint, but we need first a valid user before considering >expanding the interface.
I see. Many thanks for reply and explaination. :)
