On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:53 PM Yifei Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The correct sip/sie 0x222 could mask wrong 0x000 by VSIP_VALID_MASK,
> This patch fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> index adb0815951aa..2976666e921f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> @@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_csr(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu,
>
>         if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sip) ||
>             reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sie)) {
> -               reg_val = reg_val << VSIP_TO_HVIP_SHIFT;
>                 reg_val = reg_val & VSIP_VALID_MASK;
> +               reg_val = reg_val << VSIP_TO_HVIP_SHIFT;

Thanks for this fix. I have squashed it into PATCH5 of KVM RISC-V v14
series.

Regards,
Anup

Reply via email to