On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 09:45 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Well, I suppose the patch could go in, maybe with some ifdef's > around > > the bits in _switch_to, there's little point in doing that on non-rt > > kernels. > > As Nick Piggin already stated, and I'll even state it for the RT > kernel, > we do not allow preemption in switch_to. So it is safe to remove those > "preempt_disable" bits from the patch
Sure, I know that, I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about the added code that flush pending batches & save the batch state, since on non-rt kernel, this is not useful (the batch is only ever active within a spinlocked section, which cannot be preempted on non-rt). Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
