On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 13:50 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 03:30:32PM -0700, Kyung Min Park wrote: > > Should I mention the tool specifically although the tool is WIP? > > Well, if you wanna look at it that way, the whole kernel is > constantly > and forever WIP. :-) > > Also, if there's some functionality missing, pointing to it might > make > people send patches.
That makes sense. :) > > As you commented previously, should I use > > tools/arch/x86/tools/cpuid/cpuid as the future tool and its > > location? > > Yeah, let's just drop the second "tools", i.e., > > tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/ > > or so should be good enough. > > Thx. Sure, I'll update in the next patch. Thank you for clarifying.
