On 21-08-20, 19:37, Wan Ahmad Zainie wrote:
> Binding description for Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.moha...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml
>
> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4cbbd3887c13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,keembay-emmc-phy.yaml#";
> +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#";
> +
> +title: Intel Keem Bay eMMC PHY bindings
This seems same as
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,lgm-emmc-phy.yaml, why not
add a new compatible in lgm binding, or did I miss a difference?
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.moha...@intel.com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: intel,keembay-emmc-phy
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: emmcclk
> +
> + "#phy-cells":
> + const: 0
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#phy-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + phy@20290000 {
> + compatible = "intel,keembay-emmc-phy";
> + reg = <0x20290000 0x54>;
> + clocks = <&emmc>;
> + clock-names = "emmcclk";
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + };
> --
> 2.17.1
--
~Vinod
