On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:46:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > the current checkpatch.pl does not reject new files that lack a > newline, yet rejects patches that fix newlines in files ... quite the > opposite of what we actually want
Nice. Just what the world needs. I wonder what the heck that format means. Obviously the "corrupt" check is wrong as a "\ No newline" line is valid not corrupt. Now when is "\ No newline" a good thing and when a bad thing. It _looks_ like it is 'bound' to the line before, and if so then its pretty simple. Bad: > +moo > \ No newline at end of file Good: > -moo > \ No newline at end of file /me goes read the source for diff. Sigh. Thanks for the report. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
