On Tuesday November 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Remove defconfig ptr comparison to 0
> 
> Remove sparse warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index d019918..07b38cf 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh 
> *fhp, struct file *file,
>        * flushing the data to disk is handled separately below.
>        */
>  
> -     if (file->f_op->fsync == 0) {/* COMMIT3 cannot work */
> +     if (!file->f_op->fsync) {/* COMMIT3 cannot work */
>              stable = 2;
>              *stablep = 2; /* FILE_SYNC */
>       }
> 

Personally, I would much rather these were changed to "== NULL".
Different people have different preferences on whether to use
    ! foo
or
    foo == NULL

and the person who wrote that code is presumably showing a preference
for the later.  Changing it from "== 0" to "== NULL" is clearly a
valuable improvement.  Changing from "== 0" to "! " is a stylistic
change that should not be made lightly.

I personally often use and prefer the explicit comparison to NULL.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to