[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > These days umount is done by directory, not by device, > since a device may be mounted multiple times, so > I expect the silly message is gone. > (Is your umount recent?) > > [But this is only about the "none". I don't know what is > wrong in your situation.] My umount is 2.10r. Alan says he knows what is wrong, so we're all curiously expecting -ac7 ;) -Udo. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels Alexander Viro
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kern... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 ... Alexander Viro
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 ... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.... Alan Cox
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.... David Ford
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 ... Andreas Dilger
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kernels Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kern... Udo A. Steinberg
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 kern... J . A . Magallon
- Re: Strange umount problem in latest 2.4.0 ... Christoph Rohland