The sst write support for devices using the special SST_WRITE routine
is broken since commit commit df5c21002cf4 ("mtd: spi-nor: use spi-mem
dirmap API") because the spi_nor_create_write_dirmap() function checks
SPINOR_OP_AAI_WP and sst_write_second. These checks are not valid during
probe. The check seems also to be broken since the "op->addr.nbytes = 0"
causes the devm_spi_mem_dirmap_create() function to return
PTR_ERR(-EINVAL) and the probe() function will fail.

It seems that the commit only copy'n'pasted the existing logic. Use the
correct SST_WRITE flag and return 0 to fix both issues.

Fixes: df5c21002cf4 ("mtd: spi-nor: use spi-mem dirmap API")
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
index 65eff4ce6ab1..31869ac245a8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -3289,15 +3289,21 @@ static int spi_nor_create_write_dirmap(struct spi_nor 
*nor)
        };
        struct spi_mem_op *op = &info.op_tmpl;
 
+       /*
+        * Most SST SPI-NOR's have a special write routine.which should so
+        * dirmap.wdesc is not supported for these.
+        */
+       if (nor->info->flags & SST_WRITE) {
+               nor->dirmap.wdesc = NULL;
+               return 0;
+       }
+
        /* get transfer protocols. */
        op->cmd.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_inst_nbits(nor->write_proto);
        op->addr.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(nor->write_proto);
        op->dummy.buswidth = op->addr.buswidth;
        op->data.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_data_nbits(nor->write_proto);
 
-       if (nor->program_opcode == SPINOR_OP_AAI_WP && nor->sst_write_second)
-               op->addr.nbytes = 0;
-
        nor->dirmap.wdesc = devm_spi_mem_dirmap_create(nor->dev, nor->spimem,
                                                       &info);
        return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(nor->dirmap.wdesc);
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to