On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:00:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> >> +void migrate_disable(void)
> >> +{
> >> +  unsigned long flags;
> >> +
> >> +  if (!current->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt) {
> >> +          raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&current->pi_lock, flags);
> >> +          current->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt++;
> >> +          raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->pi_lock, flags);
> >> +  } else {
> >> +          current->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt++;
> >> +  }
> >> +}
> >
> > That pi_lock seems unfortunate, and it isn't obvious what the point of
> > it is.
> 
> Indeed. That obviously lacks a big fat comment.
> 
> current->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt++ is obviously a RMW operation. So
> you end up with the following:
> 
> CPU0                                            CPU1
> migrate_disable()
>    R = current->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt;
>                                                 set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
>                                                   task_rq_lock();
>                                                   if
>                                                   
> (!p->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt) {
>    current->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt = R + 1;
>                                                       stop_one_cpu();
> ---> stopper_thread()
>         BUG_ON(task->migration_ctrl.disable_cnt);
> 
> I tried to back out from that instead of BUG(), but that ended up being
> even more of a hacky trainwreck than just biting the bullet and taking
> pi_lock.

You don't need the load-store for that I think, pure timing will do.
Blergh, lemme prepare more wake-up juice and think about that.

Reply via email to