On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 09:54:00 +0800
Zenghui Yu <yuzeng...@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 2020/9/18 6:07, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:35:37 +0200
> > Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:31:28 +0800
> >> Zenghui Yu <yuzeng...@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It isn't clear what purpose the @bardirty serves. It might be used to
> >>> avoid
> >>> the unnecessary vfio_bar_fixup() invoking on a user-space BAR read, which
> >>> is not required when bardirty is unset.
> >>>
> >>> The variable was introduced in commit 89e1f7d4c66d ("vfio: Add PCI device
> >>> driver") but never actually used, so it shouldn't be that important.
> >>> Remove
> >>> it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzeng...@huawei.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 7 -------
> >>> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 1 -
> >>> 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Yes, it seems to have been write-only all the time.
> >
> > I suspect the intent was that vfio_bar_fixup() could test
> > vdev->bardirty to avoid doing work if no BARs had been written since
> > they were last read. As it is now we regenerate vconfig for all the
> > BARs every time any offset of any of them are read. BARs aren't
> > re-read regularly and config space is not a performance path,
>
> Yes, it seems that Qemu itself emulates all BAR registers and will read
> the BAR from the kernel side only at initialization time.
>
> > but maybe
> > we should instead test if we see any regressions from returning without
> > doing any work in vfio_bar_fixup() if vdev->bardirty is false. Thanks,
>
> I will test it with the following diff. Please let me know which way do
> you prefer.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index d98843feddce..77c419d536d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int vfio_basic_config_read(struct
> vfio_pci_device *vdev, int pos,
> int count, struct perm_bits *perm,
> int offset, __le32 *val)
> {
> - if (is_bar(offset)) /* pos == offset for basic config */
> + if (is_bar(offset) && vdev->bardirty) /* pos == offset for basic
> config */
> vfio_bar_fixup(vdev);
>
> count = vfio_default_config_read(vdev, pos, count, perm,
> offset, val);
There's only one caller currently, but I'd think it cleaner to put this
in vfio_bar_fixup(), ie. return immediately if !bardirty. Thanks,
Alex
