On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:45 PM Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:31:28PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > + free(new_expr);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + memcpy(new_expr->metric_refs,
> > old_expr->metric_refs,
> > + nr * alloc_size);
> > + } else {
> > + new_expr->metric_refs = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* calculate number of metric_events */
> > + for (nr = 0; old_expr->metric_events[nr]; nr++)
> > + continue;
> > + alloc_size = sizeof(*new_expr->metric_events);
> > + new_expr->metric_events = calloc(nr + 1, alloc_size);
> > + if (!new_expr->metric_events) {
> > + free(new_expr->metric_refs);
> > + free(new_expr);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* copy evsel in the same position */
> > + for (idx = 0; idx < nr; idx++) {
> > + evsel = old_expr->metric_events[idx];
> > + evsel = evlist__get_evsel(evlist, evsel->idx);
>
> this probably won't happen, but evlist__get_evsel can return NULL
Hmm.. yeah, it should not happen. Anyway I'll check the result.
Thanks
Namhyung
>
> > + new_expr->metric_events[idx] = evsel;
> > + }
> > +
> > + list_add(&new_expr->nd, &new_me->head);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> SNIP
>
