On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:02:34 -0400
Tony Krowiak <[email protected]> wrote:

> Attempting to unregister Guest Interruption Subclass (GISC) when the
> link between the matrix mdev and KVM has been removed results in the
> following:
> 
>    "Kernel panic -not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops"

I'm wondering how we get there (why are we unregistering the gisc if
the mdev and kvm are not yet linked or are already unlinked?), so I
agree that the actual backchain would be helpful here.

> 
> This patch fixes this bug by verifying the matrix mdev and KVM are still
> linked prior to unregistering the GISC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c 
> b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index e0bde8518745..847a88642644 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -119,11 +119,15 @@ static void vfio_ap_wait_for_irqclear(int apqn)
>   */
>  static void vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
>  {
> -     if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && q->matrix_mdev)

If checking for ->kvm is the right thing to do, I agree that moving the
check here would be easier to read.

> -             kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm, q->saved_isc);
> -     if (q->saved_pfn && q->matrix_mdev)
> -             vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> -                              &q->saved_pfn, 1);
> +     if (q->matrix_mdev) {
> +             if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && q->matrix_mdev->kvm)
> +                     kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm,
> +                                              q->saved_isc);
> +             if (q->saved_pfn)
> +                     vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> +                                      &q->saved_pfn, 1);
> +     }
> +
>       q->saved_pfn = 0;
>       q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
>  }

Reply via email to