From: Douglas Anderson
> Sent: 22 September 2020 01:26
>
> On every boot time we see messages like this:
>
> [ 0.025360] calling calibrate_xor_blocks+0x0/0x134 @ 1
> [ 0.025363] xor: measuring software checksum speed
> [ 0.035351] 8regs : 3952.000 MB/sec
> [ 0.045384] 32regs : 4860.000 MB/sec
> [ 0.055418] arm64_neon: 5900.000 MB/sec
> [ 0.055423] xor: using function: arm64_neon (5900.000 MB/sec)
> [ 0.055433] initcall calibrate_xor_blocks+0x0/0x134 returned 0 after 29296
> usecs
>
> As you can see, we spend 30 ms on every boot re-confirming that, yet
> again, the arm64_neon implementation is the fastest way to do XOR.
> ...and the above is on a system with HZ=1000. Due to the way the
> testing happens, if we have HZ defined to something slower it'll take
> much longer. HZ=100 means we spend 300 ms on every boot re-confirming
> a fact that will be the same for every bootup.
Can't the code use a TSC (or similar high-res counter) to
see how long it takes to process a short 'hot cache' block?
That wouldn't take long at all.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT,
UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
