On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:43:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 20:41, Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > The EFI pstore implementation relies on the 'efivars' abstraction, > > > which encapsulates the EFI variable store in a way that can be > > > overridden by other backing stores, like the Google SMI one. > > > > > > On top of that, the EFI pstore implementation also relies on the > > > efivars.ko module, which is a separate layer built on top of the > > > 'efivars' abstraction that exposes the [deprecated] sysfs entries > > > for each variable that exists in the backing store. > > > > > > Since the efivars.ko module is deprecated, and all users appear to > > > have moved to the efivarfs file system instead, let's prepare for > > > its removal, by removing EFI pstore's dependency on it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > > > > With this and the other pstore patch, do the pstore self-tests still > > pass on an EFI system? > > > > If so, please consider both: > > > > Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > > > > Selftests? Excellent! Are they documented too?
Not really, but they're pretty simple: cd tools/testing/selftests/pstore *double-check "config" against running kernel config* ./pstore_tests ./pstore_crash_test *wait for system to reboot* cd tools/testing/selftests/pstore ./pstore_post_reboot_tests (though please test before/after, just to make sure other deltas haven't broken things before your series -- I don't test EFI pstore with high frequency) -- Kees Cook
